Table and text compares many features of some popular object-oriented languages: C++, C#, Eiffel, Java, Perl, Python, Ruby, Smalltalk, Visual Basic.
Short text compares Ruby and Python, via Perl and Smalltalk.
Brief text compares website building languages ASP, PHP on several points. [WebProNews]
Common algorithms and other sample code in the languages: Bash and Bourne shells, C/C++, Java, MATLAB/Octave, Perl, Python, Ruby, Scheme.
Compares 2 LabVIEW versions with C: brief text, 1 table. [National Instruments]
Compares many languages in brief text, describes each by the problem it fixes. [Paul Graham]
Brief text discussing comparisons of C, C++, Java, Lisp; very useful links.
One set of requirements, 80 implementations, coded by 74 different programmers in various languages, compared for properties: run time, memory use, source text length, comment density, program structure, reliability, effort needed.
Published internal study, of Ericsson AXD 301 ATM switch project, using Erlang, C, C++, Java. Results: programmer productivity, code error rates, roughly proportional to source code size.
Comparison starts from 1999 Prechelt study results, adds many insights; as text, a few tables. [Intelligence]
Computers /
Programming /
Languages /
Directories
|